Primitive Christianity Revived, Again
Sometimes I get fed up with Theology. I don't believe a relationship with God through Jesus the Christ, comes with a complete understanding of theology or that anyone's theology, as practiced, is perfect. Keep your eyes on Jesus and walk by faith, not sight. As for Paul try to think of his writings as containing occasional sarcasm and interpret them as a whole and not just in parts and never use them to judge others. Don't forget he wrote 1 Cor. 13.
Hi Scott! Thanks for posting this, I also find myself in this category...often feeling I am walking a fence between liberal and conservative. I truly believe in the importance of the middle path...
It may help you to read Chuck Fager's article on the history of liberal Friends. Liberal Friends are not in full agreement with Elias Hicks. The Hicksites were very decidedly Christian. Liberal Friends today are not that same group.
Thanks for this wonderful post, Scott.
There are many liberal Friends who hold your view of things. It is so obvious to any with a Christian background that the theology of liberal Quakerism is so grounded in the teachings of Jesus (it is good to re-read occasionally the Sermon on the Mount to be reminded of that). And from reading and gaining a sense of his mission and vision, it is clear to me that he viewed his message of love, acceptance, and forgiveness as one that all of humankind will one day embrace. Jesus was perhaps the first universalist!
I often feel that I am a liberal Quaker more than I am a Christian. But in that declaration I still wholly and eagerly embrace the teachings of Christ without also embracing the doctrines and culture of Christendom. And I too feel I have a relationship with Jesus, even though I do not believe that is necessary in order to experience the same Spirit that was manifested through him.
I am fortunate to be part of an amazing liberal Quaker meeting where there is full recognition that the teachings of Jesus are at our core. Yet, it is also recognized that that same core of Light and Love can be found in many places. The meeting, as is true of many liberal Quaker meetings, embraces this core wherever it may be found.
I personally believe this is what Jesus wanted to happen. This was his mission; that humankind finally recognizes that God is Love. Period. That's the pure and simple message of liberal Quakerism.
As I've quoted already, as 'Quaker Guy' in "Silence Is Golden" on springfield-pa.patch, George M. Fox(Zero Decibels: The Quest For Absolute Silence) writes, "...it's tempting to invoke here the traditional Greek logic that denies substance to an absence, versus the ability of more oriental traditions to accept not only that absence(and silence?) can have import, but that it can hold several contradictory meanings at once."
Indeed, silent waiting on the Light is still the revealed quest for a country(and its people?) that professes the motto e pluribus unum.
Where did I go? If I return, George M. Foy(not Fox) wrote "Zero Decibels: The Quest For Absolute Silence". What is the Quaker version of a Freudian slip?!
Comment
© 2023 Created by QuakerQuaker. Powered by
You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!
Join QuakerQuaker