QuakerQuaker

Primitive Christianity Revived, Again

James Riemermann Minneapolis, MN United States: Like

0 members like this; Share on Facebook Tweet

Blogs
Discussions (1)
Quaker Gatherings
Quaker Beliefs/Groups (2)
Quaker Photos
Photo Albums
Quaker Videos

James Riemermann's Likes

James Riemermann's Friends

View All

James Riemermann's Groups

Universalism & Other Fai…

35 members
9 Likes
Liberal Quakers

257 members
29 Comments 36 Likes

View All

James Riemermann's Page

Visit www.nontheistfriends.org or join our email discussion list.

My monthly meeting:

www.tcfm.org

My yearly meeting:

www.northernyearlymeeting.org

Comment Wall (5 comments)

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

At 10:03am on 6th mo. 3, 2010, Pastor Samuel Muderhwa said…: Dear James
thanks for the good works you are doing and I would like to be your friend.

Pastor Samuel

At 7:46pm on 7th mo. 30, 2009, Nathan Swift said…: Never mind. It seems that all conversation that makes Martin uncomfortable is to be censored. Perhaps we can post interesting blog posts as new topics over at QuakerInfo.

At 5:07pm on 7th mo. 30, 2009, Nathan Swift said…: Thank you, James, but I don't think of it as tolerant, just as realistic. I hope you are going to hang around at least awhile, I'm formulating one more attempt to explain what it is about in relation to the last post by the little dragon (or whatever that nick is)

At 4:07pm on 1st mo. 29, 2009, Nathan Swift said…: "Christian renewal." Yes, indeed, and one of the things I hope to "renew" is that sense of openness to different ideas and bases for "Christ-like" action indicated by Paul in stating somewhere in Romans that those who do the "things of the law are a law unto themselves."

At 1:45pm on 1st mo. 29, 2009, Nathan Swift said…: I, for one, would like to especially welcome you to QuakerQuaker's new format at least. Over the last few years I have come to greatly appreciate your insights, and, while I know that there are some who would be leery of the "non-theist" label, I know where they are coming from whether we are in agreement as to the nature of that source or not. I also think that ALL theists need a healthy dose of how it looks from a more rational approach (not that the opposite is necessarily "irrational," but that "non-rational" needs to be solidly in touch with observed reality. Whatever...Welcome.
In His Love,
Nate

No comments yet!

Welcome to
QuakerQuaker

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? Our costs run to about $50/month. If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.