Primitive Christianity Revived, Again
"I believe that just about all of the world's religions are full of myths and superstitions, but behind them all lies a vital truth. I don't believe that the religions themselves know what this truth is, but the truth is there nevertheless. By contrast, I would say that atheism, though free from the falsehoods, myths, and superstitions of the religions, has no insight into the important truths that the religions dimly but incorrectly perceive. Thus I think of atheism as blind and the religions as having vision; but the vision is distorted. Atheism is static and is not getting anywhere; the religions with all their faults (and the faults are many!) are at least dynamic, and are slowly but surely overcoming their errors and converging to the truth...
"More specifically, my religious views come close to the idea of William James -- that our unconscious is contiuous with a greater spiritual reality... (whether it is personal or impersonal, conscious or unconscious or superconscious... is not for me to say.)"
[Raymond Smullyan, Who Knows? ]
-------
I happen to believe that I, and Raymond Smullyan, are slowly but surely overcoming our errors and converging to the truth -- which I personally find to be, if not 'superconscious', a t least far ahead of _me_ when I catch an occasional glimpse. Anyway, I really like this passage!
Lately I find myself far more willing to bear with a great deal of the prevalent Quaker incoherence (as well as those plausible-yet-dubious traditional notions people love to apply so dogmatically, so cut-and-driedly) due to basically the same idea -- that crazy religious ideas (even atheism) are gifts of God towards each human being's progress, representing a slightly-closer approximation which at least somebody has found to make his way forward a little clearer (at least to him.)
Tags:
My contribution to the subject has been to register appreciation for the Bible as a compendium of projections (useful, like an album collection), and to circle the Tower of Babel story especially, as important to my thinking. Like some other authors, I connect that unfinished tower to that pyramid on the dollar bill.
I'm fine with "In God We Trust" as long as the Masons get to say it with equal gusto, given their contribution etc. As a Quaker, I'm not one to pick fights with Masons. We of Multnomah Meeting shared a parking lot for years, until they sold the building to Mazamas (with whom we now share it). Convenient, that we use it at different times. Having parking can make a big difference to the life of a Meeting.
You say my contribution is a "harsh & irrational attack on the Bible" (aside to readers: don't take his word for it). You're not the only one who likes to fulminate and use QuakerQuaker to let off steam. May we call you Reverend Neener then? I know a Reverend Onan Canobite, Church of Subgenius (gnostic, a mock church). You could be a Rev too, with your own nick, your own shtick.
The Bible is a book, an inanimate object. Maybe it's back-lit when we read it, like the monks liked it, like on the Web. Maybe it's read to a child by loving parents, whom you claim were abusive, the Bible not being a children's book in your humble opinion -- poor parents just doing their best, feeding people on the streets, and all that GoodStuff, why attack them so harshly?
I know the Bible is important, here to stay, and my "opinion" of it, like my opinion of Mt. Everest, is a little bit beside the point. What I want is a nuanced relationship with the Bible and the stories in it.
However, I don't wanna be force fed (who does?) any off-the-shelf interpretations by mortal men, especially men, especially revs on the telly. I might go to some imams for more insights some days, who knows? The Persians aren't nuke-heads at least, add 20 IQ + EI points right off the bat. Ibrahim over at Right To Dream Too (sleeping shelter on W Burnside) is a cool guy, know him through AFSC work as well.
https://flic.kr/p/rXna3j (entrance to R2D2 prototype village)
From reading the newspapers, and magazines, I conclude this North American nation's media has a radically immature read on the Persians, and yet their Holy Bible could help them with that. They could grow up more. Why not? In God we trust right? So why all the nukes? Anthropology hat on.
Clearly we're off our collective gourds. And as you say, the Bible is more honored than read, more read than critically considered.
My take on the tower story is that we've collectively climbed pretty high, imagining that we're almost there (and by our own efforts) -- & that it might have been more merciful to get us down before the foundations began to groan so.
Then again, the Big AllThis can always find us in the trash afterwards, brush us off, imagine another interesting world to chew up together.
But to be 'nuanced' about the Bible (or human beings, for that matter) -- It happens a lot better if one starts from "what didn't they get wrong?"
Jesus, for example. If you stop imagining him as someone who made sense, talking to people in a culture that was no more (or less) crazy than ours, but interpreted everything in a far less individual, far more collective way -- then you can get past Those Bad Televangelists and get some hints of a no-fault, harm-reduction Divinity At Work. Again, not one seeing matters the same way we do.
Oops ... I meant, "If you start imagining him as..." Infallibility doesn't seem to have arrived, so far. So please forgive us our typos. Also our badmouthing, warranted or otherwise.
© 2023 Created by QuakerQuaker. Powered by