August 1, 2013

Quick, name a happily married couple in the New Testament. Let’s make it easier: how about just naming any married couple in the New Testament?

While you are compiling your list, let me say a few words about why this question matters. 

In these weeks after the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was declared unconstitutional (or at least the major parts of it), we are hearing frequent appeals to uphold ‘Biblical marriage’ from those who believe that marriage is simply and only between one man and one woman. They claim scriptural support for their view, but does that claim have a solid foundation? 

For example, John Yeats says that despite the Supreme Court ruling, “Biblical marriage will remain between a man and a woman. This is the clear teaching of Scripture.”  Similarly, John Piper asserts that “Marriage is created and defined by God in the Scriptures as the sexual and covenantal union of a man and a woman in life-long allegiance to each other alone, as husband and wife, with a view to displaying Christ's covenant relationship to his blood-bought church.” He cites four Biblical verses in support: Genesis 1:27-28, Genesis 2:23-24, Matthew 19:4-6, and Ephesians 5:24-32.

Time’s up; how many couples made your list?  How many married couples in the New Testament did you note?

If this question is a stumper, it is because there aren’t many.  Most of the people in the New Testament do not appear to be in marriage relationships.  Despite the repeated assertions that the Bible is clear about marriage, it is striking that so few of the people in the New Testament are seen in any kind of marriage relationship. 

Despite the fervid imaginings of Dan Brown, Jesus wasn’t married. Paul may have been married, but he was not at the time of his ministry. We know Peter was married, because reference is made to his mother-in-law, but his wife makes no appearance.  About the other Disciples we just do not know. If any of the others were married, we can wonder at the state of their relationship after they left home to follow Jesus. Martha and Mary, the Bethany sisters of Lazarus, were not married.

Yes, there are couples in the New Testament we know were married.  We know Mary and Joseph were married, happily we suppose, even after a most unusual beginning to their marriage.  We know Elizabeth and Zacharias, the parents of John the Baptist, were married. There are Priscilla and Aquila, missionary followers of Christ, who are mentioned six times in Acts, Romans, 1 Corinthians, and 2 Timothy. But there are not many others. 

There are more married couples featured in the Hebrew Testament, for example Eve and Adam, Sarah and Abraham, Rebakah and Isaac, Rachel and Jacob, Ruth and Boaz, Gomer and Hosea, and, supposing they were married, the unnamed couple in the Song of Solomon. 

If we want to draw our image of marriage from the Hebrew Testament, however, we have to recognize that polygyny (one man/multiple wives) is a quite common feature of family relationships in those books of the Bible. One man/one woman is hardly a consistent theme. Levirate marriage is also a frequent obligation: the requirement that a man marry his brother’s wife if she becomes a widow.  Do we really want to take our bearings on marriage from the Hebrew Testament?

Look back at the four passages John Piper uses to support his claim that the Bible clearly defines marriage as between one man and one woman. Each speaks of couples that include a man and a woman and each celebrates the commitment each makes to the other, but none of the passages say that this is the only form marriage can take.  And two of the passages come from Genesis, written well before the commonly accepted practice of polygyny we see in subsequent books of the Hebrew Testament. 

Next time you hear someone assert that marriage is clearly defined in the Bible, ask them – or ask yourself – where is that clearly said? And where is that clearly shown?

also posted on River View Friend

Views: 1351

Comment by Olivia on 9th mo. 21, 2013 at 11:24am

Hello Irene,

I so appreciate your caring post, open to nuances and God's action instead of cliches that we all so easily return to.  

I have wondered, myself, whether God's development of (giving space in our societies for) more spiritually-meaningful, lifelong, same-sex intimate relationships, is a natural and God-given thing to do at a time when our planet is overburdened with population problems and doesn't need more procreating.  And the same could be said about infertility in some cases.   Or asexuality.    The thing being:   What a mercy that a loving God has created ways for people to be right-with-God-within-them that are in keeping with the new population needs.  The only alternative would seem to be God making everyone want to have (and then have) children and then God making more of us have to die sooner due to the increase in plagues, the lack of food resources and water for everyone, etc. 

I have gotten way too broad in this, and perhaps painfully so, but it just flowed out to offer that I see room for God's mercy in so many ways in our reality.  I see so many ways that we don't have to resort to judging one another but could choose to have faith in a loving God in all these particulars developing in our world.  

God did not want to create a world seething with evil.  And God did not turn around to find -- oops who made the world seething with evil while I was away??      I do not come to these difficult views by wanting them to be true and then believing in my biases.   Instead I come to them by holding them loosely now in the first place (not as law), but by seeing room for grace in all our lives and seeing that our intimacy needs are complex and unique and people are not designed by God to live lives of scarcity but abundance.  

I wouldn't put it past God to create ways for our overburdened world to decrease the population without suffering.... IF we were to remain in God's flow and God's love and blessing about the whole process.   To the degree we need our present moment with God to turn less Present and become more about boxes and laws and convention than faith in God's action now....    we lose our ability to be in that core space of redemption and full responsiveness to our world.   We suffer a lot more by trying not to suffer.  We suffer less by clinging to God (aka Love aka Life aka Grace aka a living divine sentience with us at all times).  

Don't you think?

in peace,

Olivia

Comment by Olivia on 9th mo. 21, 2013 at 11:45am

sorry guys i started and i just couldn't stop

Comment by Howard Brod on 9th mo. 21, 2013 at 12:09pm
It was wonderfully loving and inspiring, Olivia. Makes much sense and speaks to the Christ within me.

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? Our costs run to about $50/month. If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.

Latest Activity

Daniel Hughes updated their profile
5 hours ago
Martin Kelley updated their profile
20 hours ago
Martin Kelley posted a blog post

QuakerQuaker migration starting soon, can you help?

Hi QuakerQuaker fans,It's time to start the migration of QuakerQuaker to a new online platform. It…See More
20 hours ago
Martin Kelley commented on QuakerQuaker's blog post 'QuakerQuaker Resolution for 2023—Can You Help?'
"Hi Christopher, thanks for your ongoing support all this time; I understand needing to slow down…"
2nd day (Mon)
Christopher Hatton posted events
1st day (Sun)
Christopher Hatton commented on QuakerQuaker's blog post 'QuakerQuaker Resolution for 2023—Can You Help?'
"Hi Martin,   I hope other users have been making occasional/regular donations.  I am…"
1st day (Sun)
Christopher Hatton liked David Anthony's profile
1st day (Sun)
Christopher Hatton updated their profile
1st day (Sun)

© 2023   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service