Primitive Christianity Revived, Again
I propose we look at Starship Earth (Buckminster Fuller's metaphor for our planet) using another metaphor as well: that of Motherboard Earth.
I tip my hat to the criticism that this is another off-base nerdy engineering lens through which to misperceive a living planet and that, although the "mother" part is apt, linking to circuit boards is just more Newtonian mechanism, more of which we simply don't need.
But I don't see it that way myself. I think of the powerful film images I've seen linking urban-scapes from high altitudes with microchips. Good native American-sounding titles like Powaqqatsi and Koyanisqaatsi come to mind (both interesting films). And the energy bathing our motherboard is more than metaphorically electrical.
In sum, I don't see "motherboard" as necessarily whiteman talk at all, but a clear-eyed snapshot of what, in fact, our eco-economy is: a set of spherical circuits, layer upon layer, some phased in with humans just a split second ago, on the geologic timescale.
Moving on, I look at the psychology of banking, which seems to view this pool of liquid capital, called gold or currency or whatever it is that's convertible to just about anything of value, as the one thing we cannot afford to "leak" away. The whole investment banking circuitry is about wiring up projects and programs and powering them with "juice" (liquid capital) only if it appears the return will exceed the investment. The only electronics on the motherboard that interests bankers is the kind that "nets a return" meaning it has to return all the juice received, and then some.
If I think of my computer as the motherboard, and the wire plugged into the wall as my umbilical link to the sun, then I start to wonder about the intelligence of microcode which plans to starve motherboard assets which are not designed to amplify and return juice. I mean, the way a computer is designed is like a water wheel: current flows downhill to the ground, in the meantime turning wheels which turn other wheels and so on. Yes, the liquid electricity all drains out the bottom, but serious work got done in the meantime. Capacitors and storage batteries pool current for a time, before allowing it to surge onward (the banking idea of savings). But nowhere is the motherboard (the computer I'm using) designed to return juice to the wall let alone "with interest."
I look at TV images of human skeletons, either getting a little charity, or dying in droves, or both, with economists off to the side shaking their heads: no way to organize these humans into projects which will net a return to the bankers, and we can't allow our precious "juice" to just "leak away." So we let our human families starve to death.
That's just the way it is ... but is nature our model here, or banking? The sun is broadcasting terawatts of energy in our direction, second by second. What we do is insert our programmable circuitry, our gizmos, our wheels turning wheels, and reap the benefits. Within this game, we have liquid asset accounts, and transactions, and trade. But the overall big picture is of a motherboard plugged into the sun and human circuitry that is designed to starve large portions of the motherboard based on some dogma about needing to retain precious liquid, currency, without regard for the true state of affairs, which is that the great global ecosystem is not about returning juice to the sun, anymore than my computer is about returning juice to the wall socket. Doing useful work, yes. Keeping energy from flowing downhill, no way.
So that's why I propose General Systems Theory, which has a clear view of the sun-powered motherboard, the humanly programmable circuitry which interlayers with nonhuman circuitry, and the pain and suffering of numerous humans who are left out because they don't have magic 'juice returning powers' -- why I propose that GST build itself as antithetical to the juice-worshipping tribes who use their primitive 'economics' to justify the status quo media programming.
GST takes inventory of human inventions, artifacts, and storyboards multi-media deployment scenarios, casting humans in new, interesting, intelligent roles, and sees that we have the props, and the actors necessary, to make the real-world scenario entitled: Humans Make a Success of Themselves (lots of subplots). But instead, the old curriculum directors continue to produce episode after episode of The Great Tragedy, claiming that they are the sophisticated ones, whereas we, the success-oriented directors, are naive, because we don't properly understand their Theory of Juice.
GST has a different view of juice, it's true. I say we can afford to drive programming, using solar inputs, that will not only prevent starvation, but enroll the starving in new distance education programs that nets them lots of other relevant assets besides food: medical care, shelter, information, entertainment, vehicles for self-expression, opportunities to see more of the planet before they die. I say we don't have to expect our global university students to pay back their scholarships in any silly literal kind of way, but that the work of learning a living, of demonstrating competence, of being a star in world game scenarios worthy of high caliber acting, is repayment enough.
Do the work of Making Humans a Success, and forget about 'netting a return' in the traditional bankers' sense. Create wealth (life support), not just more money, and find out how much better off we will all find ourselves in short order. Lets co-invent General Systems Theory to light the way forward. And lets leave Economics behind, in the current Dark Age, where it belongs.
Kirby Urner
4 June 1995
Save
Keith, it sounds like you're saying people should all turn their backs on their mental endeavors, be that flying or designing airplanes, constructing high rises, tilling the fields or whatever.
On the other hand, if the Inward Presence leads someone to perform as a brain surgeon or bus driver, then who's to say they're not in a state of immanence same as you?
If you're sitting in judgement, thinking "that person can't be governed by the immanent Presence because they're using outward tools" (such as writing in QuakerQuaker), then I'm confused.
Certainly you participate in outward forms, just as everyone does. You listen to music and drink beer. That already implies vast industry and horticulture, people doing outward things, operating within institutions.
Suggesting people all turn their backs on the intellect and outward forms just doesn't seem like useful advice in a world of close to eight billion people all working to get through each day, one day at a time. Wouldn't following your advice lead to mass starvation and chaos? If not, please explain.
Probably one of our most important outward forms is the clock and calendar, a shared "wheel of time" whereby we're able to make appointments, schedule stuff, plan. We plan against the backdrop of a calendar. Is that something the immanent Presence would never have us do in your experience? Jesus was telling us to throw away (not make any use of) our ability to schedule? How would we keep the Sabbath in that case?
As you probably know, QuakerQuaker may not be long for this world and all your outward forms (words) contributed here will likely be gone soon. I'd think an exercise in not participating in outward forms would be to staunch the flow of your outward words and allow your testimony to stop vibrating the outward airwaves. How do you justify all this outward form activity, in light of your testimony?
It sounds like you're recommending we each dig a grave and fall into it, whispering our praises to Jesus as we do so. But then a grave is an outward form. When do we ever get out of bed in your scenario? What's the science fiction if millions of people were suddenly to follow your advice? Would we still have electricity? Don't feel you have to reply. That would be participating in outward forms.
If there were 'no Spirit present in it' nothing whatsoever would be happening at all -- no physical bodies (unneeded), emotions, or intellect. Not even an 'us' to experience any of it.
Aside from Isaid/hesaid, everything we know comes down to life within forms that get their vitality (or if they don't, become deadened & 'mechanical' in the bad sense) from the Spirit's continuing participation in maintaining them.
Becoming disembodied is not superior to remaining embodied; becoming apathetic is no improvement on having emotional pleasures & pains -- (though trying to feel, or to not feel what the Spirit brings us is clearly wasted effort), turning off the intellect is no better than relying on it unduly.
When Anne & I helped out at the food line, people brought whatever they'd been accustomed to bringing, more if we'd nearly run out the last time. The same people did this because we had the routine down. The same ex-Marine stood around being 'Not-security' and the hungry people mostly behaved just fine (& most all the time would have anyway. We did this the same days & the same times because that's how people knew to find us (including the police, who sympathized but did work for people who didn't.) We didn't ask people who showed up to help 'How come?'
By the way, Keith, I would certainly classify trying to get the bulk of the population to rely on "direct guidance of immanent Presence itself" among those intractable problems I was referring to -- and did not mean "work on them all together" as "all of us get together to work on them" but rather to mean "[whoever is so led] follow that guidance so as to work on the whole kitten-kaboodle."
[For someone relying on Spirit to guide you, you sometimes seem inexplicably touchy towards statements which were not, in fact, contradicting your apparently intellectually-held position. (I don't object to you holding that position, but find holding it while denying reliance on any such mental fortifications a bit inconsistent.]
I talked to an ambulance driver/medic in Sacramento back ~early 70's.
His story was about a recent LSD trip of his... during which he became concerned about the young woman next door, walked in (many people didn't lock their doors back then) and found that she'd taken a suicidal dose of some sedative. His training equipped him quite well for this kind of situation; he dialed 911 and set immediately to doing all the appropriate first-aid procedures.
While he was doing this, he was simulataneously 'seeing' himself floating in pursuit of her up a long astral tunnel towards death. He caught up to her and led her back as he was completing his first-aid measures.
?
Thanks for going through my devil's advocacy briefing with a fine toothed comb Keith, and responding to each point. I think you'll continue to offer readers a viable alternative to anyone in a bully pulpit telling them how they've gotta think and obey. Such outward forms are for losers, basically. But then compassion kicks in and testimony such as yours is shared, balancing our tendency to get lost in what's less than immanent. Keep up the good work.
Comment
© 2023 Created by QuakerQuaker. Powered by
You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!
Join QuakerQuaker