If the mountain won't come to Mohammed, then Mohammed will come to the mountain

Although attributed to Mohammed, the Prophet of Islam, by Francis Bacon in a brief essay entitled On Boldness in 1625; the actual phrase can’t be traced directly to Mohammed. Bacon suggests that Mohammed said these words after being unsuccessful in performing the miracle of beckoning a hill to come to him, showed wisdom with these words rather than admitting defeat. His words could read as humble, practical or bold. He could be acknowledging that he could not move the mountain with a sense of humility; he could be moving forward practically and just getting things done, or if could be moving to the mountain with bravado getting past any embarrassment of failing his task. Sometimes people offer the words in a general way with no direct reference to Mohammed. Whether you call it compromise, ingenuity, or simple wisdom - it worked! It stands as praise of practicality and flexibility.

Mark 9:27
And if your eye causes you to stumble, tear it out;
it is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye
than to have two eyes and to be thrown into hell

Jesus spoke these words only once in Mark but twice in Matthew (5:29 and 18:9). History indicates people understanding them as exaggeration for otherwise we would have millions of one-eyed Christians walking the planet. Like the words attributed to Mohammed, we are led to value compromise. Whereas Mohammed would have impressed mountains by commanding them to move, Christians desire to avoid sin without pulling out one of their eyes: self-enucleation! However, there are times where one should settle for the wisest rather than the most ambitious or most desired choice. Like we will read elsewhere, keep it short and simple.

I will be honest here; I am more than open to other interpretations of the words attributed to Mohammed. 

Views: 280

Comment by Forrest Curo on 2nd mo. 23, 2017 at 2:58pm

~"If your way of seeing things leads you to do wrong, get rid of it! If your methods for doing things are doing harm, stop it!"

Aramaic, like ancient Hebrew, was a relatively pure language -- based a few concrete root words conceptionally spread to cover related meanings, and lots of metaphoric expressions to eloquently express what we English speakers do with loan words from more abstract languages. Thus it translates beautifully into less metaphoric languages -- but had best not be taken too literally.

Comment by Glenn Morison on 2nd mo. 23, 2017 at 3:36pm

Forrest, exactly! Thanks.

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? Our costs run to about $50/month. If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.

Latest Activity

Daniel Hughes updated their profile
4 hours ago
Martin Kelley updated their profile
19 hours ago
Martin Kelley posted a blog post

QuakerQuaker migration starting soon, can you help?

Hi QuakerQuaker fans,It's time to start the migration of QuakerQuaker to a new online platform. It…See More
19 hours ago
Martin Kelley commented on QuakerQuaker's blog post 'QuakerQuaker Resolution for 2023—Can You Help?'
"Hi Christopher, thanks for your ongoing support all this time; I understand needing to slow down…"
2nd day (Mon)
Christopher Hatton posted events
1st day (Sun)
Christopher Hatton commented on QuakerQuaker's blog post 'QuakerQuaker Resolution for 2023—Can You Help?'
"Hi Martin,   I hope other users have been making occasional/regular donations.  I am…"
1st day (Sun)
Christopher Hatton liked David Anthony's profile
1st day (Sun)
Christopher Hatton updated their profile
1st day (Sun)

© 2023   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service