Becoming the Community the Spirit Would Have Us Be

Note: I originally posted this as a comment to Mike Shell’s stimulating blog, “Seeing Beyond the Projections” (which I recommend you also read).  I offer it here as a separate blog to invite comments just on it.

_____________________________

It is unfortunate that many of our Quaker meetings/churches have brought into the meetinghouse the divisiveness that is so prevalent in the world at large.  One of the great charges of Jesus is that God provides for and loves all - even those we might individually consider wrong, misguided, and so forth. Lao-tzu in the Tao Te Ching says the same thing.  Further, Jesus stated that we each should love all in this same perfect manner. If this isn't "universalism", then I don't know what is.  Yet, you cannot love someone of a different perspective, if you don't take the first action of welcoming them into your spiritual community.

I will speak here from the liberal Quaker perspective - but my questions could easily apply also to pastoral and evangelical Friends.  If our meetings do not appeal to the varying shades of Christianity and general spirituality, the whole political spectrum, the rainbow of ethnic origins, varied economic backgrounds, and intellectual capacities - then we just might not be loving (as a community) others, as Jesus suggests we should.  It is one thing to say we accept all; but the 'proof in the pudding' is how comfortable are the 'all' being among us.

Again, let's just take liberal Quakers as an example (an easy one to point to for me because I am part of a liberal Quaker meeting).  The form of worship utilized by liberal Quakers could be an inviting environment for all - no pastor, no sermon, no anything but the living Spirit to minister among us.  However, many of our meetings don't come off as inviting to Republicans, Evangelical Christians, etc.  Our dedication to the movement of the Spirit among us should be uniting us in love - period.  Yet, we often act as the world does by sending subtle messages that we don't respect, accept, or value these "others".

We must ask ourselves direct questions as a meeting in order to reform ourselves into the community the Spirit wants us to be.  Such as, "Do we emphasize our SPICES testimonies (Simplicity, Peace, Integrity, Community, Equality, Stewardship) without also emphasizing what political action Friends should take?  Does our Peace and Social Concerns committee stick to these testimonies - or do they direct Friends on how they should vote or what they should support in order to "be good Quakers"?  Example: My yearly meeting's Peace committee recently sent out a directive that Friends should contact their legislators about supporting the Iran Nuclear Treaty.  This was done in a directive manner without first arriving at a sense of the yearly meeting that we ALL wanted to do this?  Yet, we have some politically conservative Friends among us who sincerely believe that this treaty will lead to war, violating our Peace testimony.  Surely, it must be obvious to any objective person that our common support for our testimonies does not mean we all support the same political actions in order to manifest them.

Our meetings/churches would do well to embrace some humility before we make assumptions about those among us.  While we all embrace love and light, it is unlikely that we all embrace the same application of these in daily earthly life.  And unless we have come to a common understanding through our Quaker process that we are unified in particular secular action, we must concentrate on spiritual unity above all else.  This is the only way we will ever be able to demonstrate that we actively love all.  The Bible itself says “God is Love”, and so it makes perfect sense that Jesus consistently advocated for Love above all else.  What better basis for our spiritual unity could we have than this?

This simple change in attitude within our meetings/churches could make a distinguishing difference and a witness to the world we live in.

Views: 980

Comment by Patricia Dallmann on 9th mo. 21, 2015 at 9:39am

When a man or woman comes to this pass, that they have nothing to rely upon but the Lord, then they will meet together to wait upon the Lord: And this was the first ground or motive of our setting up meetings; and I would to God that this was the use that every one would make of them that come to them, then they would be justly and properly used, according the end of the institution of them at first; we should use them as poor desolate helpless people that are broken off from all their own confidence and trust, and have nothing to rely upon but the mercy and goodness of God; and if he pleaseth to reveal his power among us, we know that he is able to save us. And when we have met with the revelation of God's power, and we have met together in simplicity of mind, the Lord was pleased to communicate his Spirit unto us, and open a door for us, and discover and reveal to us that it was the day of his power: And when we came to examine ourselves whether we were willing in this day of God's power (for the prophet gives us a note of distinction between the people of God, and other people; thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power; which is as much as to say, when God discovers and reveals his power to them, such a people are willing to give themselves over to the government of it;) when we found we were subject to it, we had joy in believing, before we attained the end of our hope; it was gladness to us we found ourselves willing; and I am persuaded that every one of you would be glad to find yourselves willing to part with that which you cry out against (from Stephen Crisp's The Kingdom of God Within). Italics in the passage were added by me. 

It is not only the expectant waiting worship which is necessary but coming into worship having reached an awareness that one is, as Crisp so beautifully says, "a poor desolate helpless people that are broken off from all their own confidence and trust, and have nothing to rely upon but the mercy and goodness of God." This necessary humility results from living in time with a deep hunger for what is real, and a refusal to accept false foundations for self-confidence/identity.

Comment by Jim Wilson on 9th mo. 21, 2015 at 10:13am

Patricia, that is a beautiful and uplifting quote.  Is there an online version of this work.  If not, can you refer me to the edition you are using?

Thanks, Jim

Comment by Howard Brod on 9th mo. 21, 2015 at 11:10am

Thank you Patricia for the reminder of what brings us to worship: that sense of humility and awareness that we need a connection with the divine to truly be uplifted to a heavenly place in our hearts in this life.

Comment by Patricia Dallmann on 9th mo. 21, 2015 at 12:07pm

Jim, I am glad that you also find this quote to be beautiful. The full sermon can be found at nffquaker.org/page/the-kingdom-of-god-within on the New Foundation Fellowship site. There is good understanding throughout the sermon, and one idea in paragraph four pertains to the sequential relationship between inward and outward operation of God's power, which has been touched upon in this thread. Here's that paragraph:

First, inwardly; there is a great inclination in the minds of people, to look more at the operation of God's power in this great work outwardly, that to look at it inwardly, but unto that there must be a daily cross taken up, and it is my business at this time to tell you in the name of the Lord, that your duty and mine is to turn our minds to the working of the power of God in ourselves, and to see that other kingdom of the man of sin weakened and brought down within us; then there is no fear but he will carry on his work outwardly, and we shall see as much of that work as belongs to our generation; but the great matter and chief government of you and me, is to see the kingdom of God set up within us, which stands in holiness and righteousness: Our business is to walk till we see the righteousness of this kingdom set up within us, in our hearts and souls, and to have a real change made.

Comment by Forrest Curo on 9th mo. 21, 2015 at 12:52pm

While I said that this fuss had prepared me to speak at an after-Meeting meeting I had not planned to attend -- what I left out was that in the moment before I spoke, I could not imagine what I was to say or how I could possibly say it -- and the result of all my babbling was to prompt a more eloquent colleague to say what had been on his mind. I was, at that point, throwing up my hands for God to do what I could not... and this is, I think, where any 'activism' or inactivism we do has to be based.

Comment by Kirby Urner on 9th mo. 21, 2015 at 1:38pm

Setting up worship on the one hand "versus" doing works in the world on the other, is a false dichotomy. Quakers self sort by temperament along a spectrum, from quietist to ranter, have done so for hundreds of years, with no single Friend condemned to just one station on that radio dial (we're free to dial in day by day).

Full spectrum Quakerism is friendly to both extremes. I am leery of any preaching / teaching which would deny its activist heritage in favor of some brand of quietism deemed "more pure". Keep the doors open to activists, invite them in. Then remind them that some Friends are not boat rockers and prefer to eschew participation on activist committees (however named). Nominating is sensitive to those preferences.

No drastic curtailment of services offered to the public (i.e. an opportunity to be part of a Quaker activist lineage) need apply among Liberal Friends. If you find out the Quaker meeting or temple you plan to join is unwelcoming to activists, shop around. Quakers are a varied tradition and the differences between them may be great. Lots of people move to Portland because of local oppressive brands of Christianity. Activists will always be welcome here. Consider joining us.

Comment by Forrest Curo on 9th mo. 21, 2015 at 1:58pm

And if any of us whimpering cowards just want to sit quietly and not bother that nice Mr. Pilate, we're welcome too? Gracious, gracious!

Seriously, you have been trying to impose your view of what we're sposed to be on people who are simply wanting us to first let the Spirit answer that question. And I don't think we can afford to "solve" any more problems the way we've been trying to do it instead.

Comment by Kirby Urner on 9th mo. 21, 2015 at 2:17pm

Saying I'm "trying to impose" something comes across as accusatory, whereas I'm more creating a safe space, going forward, for Friends of my ilk, the ones who might have heard the Spirit already? Just because you're still waiting to see you way clear is not a red light for the rest of us. I leave you alone at your stoplight, not imposing a thing. I'm thousands of miles away.

Comment by Forrest Curo on 9th mo. 21, 2015 at 2:33pm

Past tense. Some of us do have memories; and when somebody goes out of their way to denigrate people who disagree with them, we do remember that; and though we might ideally want to let Wiley Coyote backpeddle quietly back onto the cliff he just ran off, we also build up resentment from past misbehavior.

It's not as though we never did anything dumb ourselves. But sometimes, it's simply better to let things rest.

Comment by Keith Saylor on 9th mo. 21, 2015 at 4:01pm

 Our heritage as members of the community of heaven is our safe place. Neither men nor women nor outward political or religious institutions "create" a safe place. Or safe place is by and through the power of the immediate presence of Christ illuminating our conscious and informing our conscience. Our illuminated being, by the inward Light, and its outshining in the world is not created outwardly it is born inwardly and we walk in eternity by that power within us. 

Our heavenly heritage is a sufficient safe place in itself and it is right there with us right now even as I write this and as you read it. Our experienced heavenly heritage is activism and by that eternal Presence we "see" the world transformed even amidst the yuckiness of the heavens overshadowed by an outward faith. In our Heritage there is no-thing to create ... it is gifted in all things and in all moments.

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? Our costs run to about $50/month. If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.

Latest Activity

Daniel Hughes updated their profile
5 hours ago
Martin Kelley updated their profile
20 hours ago
Martin Kelley posted a blog post

QuakerQuaker migration starting soon, can you help?

Hi QuakerQuaker fans,It's time to start the migration of QuakerQuaker to a new online platform. It…See More
20 hours ago
Martin Kelley commented on QuakerQuaker's blog post 'QuakerQuaker Resolution for 2023—Can You Help?'
"Hi Christopher, thanks for your ongoing support all this time; I understand needing to slow down…"
2nd day (Mon)
Christopher Hatton posted events
1st day (Sun)
Christopher Hatton commented on QuakerQuaker's blog post 'QuakerQuaker Resolution for 2023—Can You Help?'
"Hi Martin,   I hope other users have been making occasional/regular donations.  I am…"
1st day (Sun)
Christopher Hatton liked David Anthony's profile
1st day (Sun)
Christopher Hatton updated their profile
1st day (Sun)

© 2023   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service