Admiting I'm not marginalized: The blessings of dual membership

My God, My God – Why hast thou made me so different!
To begin with, I have never felt a love like I feel from the Creator God. I have never felt drawn to be close to anyone in a healthy way until I could accept that I was loved. YHWH’s love for me made it possible for me to love others, even my enemies. I know YHWH and the divine desire for my life because of the life of Jesus of Nazareth, who I deem as being the person in history through whom salvation comes. I believe this salvation is universal.
To share this in a liberal meeting might mean spiritual marginalization. It’s not that folks won’t accept me for where I am at spiritually (at least most folks will), but that, because I have found a path for myself, and am able to express it in meaningful ways through the use of a specific language, I feel that I am suspect in the eyes of most “seekers.” How often have I heard it said that “there are many paths to the divine.” That may be true, but is that an appropriate response to someone whose life has been saved, and changed dramatically, through the experience of divine particularity? Where is it that I get support for my particularity in the FGC expression of Quakerism? Where do I find a place in the context of the Religious Society of Friends where I feel like I am worshipping the same God as others in the sense of a truly gathered meeting?
I found support for my particularity in Conservative Friends, and my family travels the width of the state of Michigan once a month to participate in worship in the name of the Christ, Jesus. Our family’s leading to dress plain, and make specific use of the biblical narrative, in coordination with Christ-centered waiting worship, is buoyed by our relationship with Crossroads Meeting in Flint, where we are affiliate members in Ohio Yearly Meeting.
However, I am feeling like I exist on the fringes of Conservative Friends because, as I presented at Yearly Meeting this year, I do not believe in the blood atonement. I am not a believer in a virgin birth (I do believe firmly in resurrection), or am I a believer in the infallibility of the Scriptures. In fact, while I have a deep and abiding love for Scripture, I am often the recipient of leadings by the Holy Spirit that stand in firm contrast with parts of Scripture. Am I alone among Conservative Friends in an understanding that Paul did not write many of the letters attributed to him, or that I can disagree with Pauline theology even though I value it, or that, in fact, Paul was just wrong about some things? When I presented at Ohio Yearly Meeting, someone immediately spoke aloud that my theology resembled that of Elias Hicks. I wonder what Conservative Friends think of my support of same-sex marriage. I must admit, I haven’t brought it up.
Of course, I am not Elias Hicks, but I deeply value the relationships that I have forged within my Hicksite meeting in Grand Rapids, where my family has full membership. Regardless of our differences, I know that I can contribute to the health and direction of the meeting, and that it has been one of the most valued spiritual relationships of our lives. I also enjoy that it allows me an opportunity to explore theological leanings without perceived burdens.
On the other hand, I value the community of eldering that exists in Ohio Yearly Meeting – the stability of knowing that the biblical narrative is being lived out in the manner of Friends as it has been for a few hundred years – with Jesus at the core.
As I began to write this, I felt like I was on the margins of both groups of Friends, but now that I think of it, I may have the best of the spiritual world at my fingertips. Perhaps God has brought me to a space in the middle because I can learn valuable spiritual truths from both groups. Perhaps I can serve as a reminder to Friends of one persuasion that the biblical narrative is a valuable asset to our community, and to Friends of another persuasion, that the roots of apostasy were laid in the First Century, and remind Christ-centered Friends that the “doctrines of men” are just that. The Bible informs our faith, but the Holy Spirit waters our spiritual seeds. Blood atonement, and indeed, all of Christendom, might be at the end of their long run.
In the words of some Friends, I am a (Quaker), not a Christian – But I am thoroughly Christ-centered, believing in the salvific work of YHWH through the life of Jesus of Nazareth, and if the middle is where I must be, than I guess I will just have to continue to reap the blessings.

Views: 369

Comment by James C Schultz on 6th mo. 26, 2013 at 10:18am

Sometimes I get fed up with Theology.  I don't believe a relationship with God through Jesus the Christ, comes with a complete understanding of theology or that anyone's theology, as practiced, is perfect.  Keep your eyes on Jesus and walk by faith, not sight.  As for Paul try to think of his writings as containing occasional sarcasm and interpret them as a whole and not just in parts and never use them to judge others.  Don't forget he wrote 1 Cor. 13.

 

Comment by Zaley Warkentin on 6th mo. 26, 2013 at 1:27pm

Hi Scott! Thanks for posting this, I also find myself in this category...often feeling I am walking a fence between liberal and conservative. I truly believe in the importance of the middle path...

Comment by Mackenzie on 6th mo. 26, 2013 at 5:22pm

It may help you to read Chuck Fager's article on the history of liberal Friends. Liberal Friends are not in full agreement with Elias Hicks. The Hicksites were very decidedly Christian. Liberal Friends today are not that same group.

Comment by Howard Brod on 6th mo. 26, 2013 at 7:54pm

Thanks for this wonderful post, Scott. 

There are many liberal Friends who hold your view of things.  It is so obvious to any with a Christian background that the theology of liberal Quakerism is so grounded in the teachings of Jesus (it is good to re-read occasionally the Sermon on the Mount to be reminded of that).  And from reading and gaining a sense of his mission and vision, it is clear to me that he viewed his message of love, acceptance, and forgiveness as one that all of humankind will one day embrace.  Jesus was perhaps the first universalist!

I often feel that I am a liberal Quaker more than I am a Christian.  But in that declaration I still wholly and eagerly embrace the teachings of Christ without also embracing the doctrines and culture of Christendom. And I too feel I have a relationship with Jesus, even though I do not believe that is necessary in order to experience the same Spirit that was manifested through him.

I am fortunate to be part of an amazing liberal Quaker meeting where there is full recognition that the teachings of Jesus are at our core.  Yet, it is also recognized that that same core of Light and Love can be found in many places.  The meeting, as is true of many liberal Quaker meetings, embraces this core wherever it may be found. 

I personally believe this is what Jesus wanted to happen.  This was his mission; that humankind finally recognizes that God is Love.  Period.  That's the pure and simple message of liberal Quakerism.

Comment by Clem Gerdelmann on 6th mo. 28, 2013 at 8:01am

As I've quoted already, as 'Quaker Guy'  in "Silence Is Golden" on springfield-pa.patch, George M. Fox(Zero Decibels: The Quest For Absolute Silence) writes, "...it's tempting to invoke here the traditional Greek logic that denies substance to an absence, versus the ability of more oriental traditions to accept not only that absence(and silence?) can have import, but that it can hold several contradictory meanings at once."

Indeed, silent waiting on the Light is still the revealed quest for a country(and its people?) that professes the motto e pluribus unum

Comment by Clem Gerdelmann on 6th mo. 29, 2013 at 6:59am

Where did I go? If I return, George M. Foy(not Fox) wrote "Zero Decibels: The Quest For Absolute Silence". What is the Quaker version of a Freudian slip?!

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? Our costs run to about $50/month. If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.

Latest Activity

Daniel Hughes updated their profile
5 hours ago
Martin Kelley updated their profile
20 hours ago
Martin Kelley posted a blog post

QuakerQuaker migration starting soon, can you help?

Hi QuakerQuaker fans,It's time to start the migration of QuakerQuaker to a new online platform. It…See More
20 hours ago
Martin Kelley commented on QuakerQuaker's blog post 'QuakerQuaker Resolution for 2023—Can You Help?'
"Hi Christopher, thanks for your ongoing support all this time; I understand needing to slow down…"
2nd day (Mon)
Christopher Hatton posted events
1st day (Sun)
Christopher Hatton commented on QuakerQuaker's blog post 'QuakerQuaker Resolution for 2023—Can You Help?'
"Hi Martin,   I hope other users have been making occasional/regular donations.  I am…"
1st day (Sun)
Christopher Hatton liked David Anthony's profile
1st day (Sun)
Christopher Hatton updated their profile
1st day (Sun)

© 2023   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service